Is Design Worth the Investment? What McKinsey Found

Christoph Bogatzki, Cluma
Christoph Bogatzki
•
8
min read
In a bright meeting room, Blink inspects the taller of two purple bar blocks through a magnifying glass while Mumble hovers behind and watches
Group of colorful Cluma monster characters standing in a row
Get a design team that ships every 48 hours

Senior-led design for SaaS teams, one flat monthly price per module.

Thanks, you're in. Pick a time that works for you:
Book a call
Something went wrong. Please check your email and try again.

Yes, the evidence points that way: in McKinsey’s five-year study of 300 publicly listed companies, the top quartile of design performers grew revenue 32 percentage points faster and total returns to shareholders 56 percentage points faster than their industry peers [1]. McKinsey sums it up as growing revenues and shareholder returns at “nearly twice the rate” of industry counterparts [1].

For a SaaS founder, marketing lead or product lead, that's the question behind every design budget: will it pay back? This article walks through what McKinsey found, the four habits that set the top performers apart and what they mean for a SaaS team. It ends with how to build those habits without hiring a whole design department. More sourced data sits on the Cluma reports page.

What did McKinsey find about the value of design?

McKinsey describes its study as, at the time of writing, the most extensive and rigorous research of its kind [1]. Its researchers tracked the design practices of 300 publicly listed companies over five years, interviewed or surveyed their senior business and design leaders, collected more than two million pieces of financial data and recorded more than 100,000 design actions [1]. A regression analysis then picked out the 12 design actions most closely linked to better financial performance. Those actions fall into four themes, which form the McKinsey Design Index, or MDI, a rating of how strong a company is at design [1].

FindingFigureSource
Revenue growth, top-quartile design performers vs industry peers, five years32 percentage points fasterArticle [1], Exhibit 3 [2]
Growth in total returns to shareholders (TRS), same comparison56 percentage points fasterArticle [1], Exhibit 3 [2]
Annual revenue growth, top quartile vs industry benchmarks10% vs 3 to 6%Exhibit 1 [2]
Annual TRS growth, top quartile vs industry benchmarks21% vs 12 to 16%Exhibit 1 [2]
Companies tracked300 publicly listed companies, five yearsArticle [1]
Data behind itMore than 2 million pieces of financial data, more than 100,000 design actionsArticle [1]
IndustriesMedical technology, consumer goods, retail bankingArticle [1]

What does 32 percentage points of extra growth look like?

It's the lead in growth over the whole five years, measured against industry peers [1]. McKinsey’s own annual rates show how big that is. Exhibit 1 of the report puts the top quartile’s revenue growth at 10% a year, against 3 to 6% for industry benchmarks [2]. Run that over five years:

  • 10% a year compounds to 61% (1.10 to the fifth power is 1.61).
  • 3 to 6% a year compounds to 16 to 34% (1.03 to the fifth is 1.16, 1.06 to the fifth is 1.34).
  • The lead lands between 27 and 45 percentage points, right around McKinsey’s 32.

We did that arithmetic ourselves. It also shows why McKinsey talks about nearly twice the rate: 61% growth is 32 points ahead of peers growing 29% (61 minus 32), roughly double their growth.

What is design worth to a business?

What is the business value of design according to McKinsey & Company?

McKinsey found a strong correlation between high design scores and superior business performance [1].

Most of the payoff sat at the top.

Differences between the second, third and fourth quartiles were marginal, and in McKinsey’s words the market “disproportionately rewarded companies that truly stood out from the crowd” [1].

That's the useful part for a budget decision. Reaching the top quartile took excellence across all four themes of the index, and McKinsey found that combination relatively rare [1]. Company scores ranged from 43 to 92 [1], so there's a lot of room between an average design practice and a great one.

In McKinsey’s data, the lead went to companies that did all four things well, which suggests design works as an ongoing practice more than a one-off project.

Did top design performers lead in every industry?

They did in all three industries McKinsey studied: medical technology, consumer goods and retail banking [1]. McKinsey reads that as a sign that good design matters whether a company sells physical goods, digital products, services or a mix [1].

Grouped bar chart of the lead of top-quartile McKinsey Design Index companies over peers, 2013 to 2018, in percentage points. Overall: revenue 32, TRS 56. Consumer packaged goods: 25 and 41. Medical technology: 42 and 108. Retail banking: 27 and 18.
Lead of top-quartile MDI companies over peers, 2013 to 2018, percentage points. Source: McKinsey, The Business Value of Design, Exhibit 3 [2].

The size of the lead varied by sector. In medical technology, the top quartile’s lead in shareholder returns reached 108 percentage points, almost twice the 56-point average [2]. Consumer packaged goods came in at 25 points of revenue and 41 of TRS, while in retail banking the revenue lead of 27 points was the stronger of the two [2].

The four habits of top-quartile design performers

The four themes read like a playbook. Each one below pairs what McKinsey saw with how it translates to a SaaS team, from the metrics you report to the way you ship. More practical guides sit on our tutorials page.

Analytical leadership: measure design like revenue

The best financial performers treated design as a top-management issue and tracked design performance with the same rigor as revenues and costs [1]. Just over half of the companies surveyed admitted they had no objective way to assess or set targets for their design teams’ output [1].

SaaS takeaway: tie design work to numbers you already report.

  • Pick the metric each piece of work should move: trial-to-paid conversion, activation, onboarding completion, demo requests or support tickets about the interface.
  • Review design in the same meeting as pipeline.

User experience: design the whole journey

Top-quartile companies broke down the walls between physical, digital and service design [1]. They start from the customer journey and its pain points, backed by research gathered firsthand, and they champion those insights in every meeting. Yet only around 50 percent of the companies surveyed ran user research before generating their first design ideas [1].

SaaS takeaway: buyers don't see departments. The ad, the website, the signup, the product, the onboarding emails and the sales deck are one experience.

  • Map your journey from first click to first value.
  • Talk to a few users before you brief a feature.
  • Fix the moments where the story breaks.

Cross-functional talent: make design everyone’s job

The top performers made user-centric design everyone’s responsibility instead of a siloed function [1]. One of the strongest correlations in the research linked top financial performance to breaking down functional silos and integrating designers with other functions [1]. Top-quartile companies were also almost three times more likely to run incentive programs for designers tied to design outcomes [1].

SaaS takeaway: keep design inside the loop. Designers should see the roadmap, the campaign calendar and customer feedback, and product, marketing and engineering should see design work while it's still in progress. A shared board where requests, updates and revisions live does more for this than any org chart.

Continuous iteration: test early, keep improving

Design flourishes where teams keep learning, testing and iterating with users, which McKinsey says raises the odds of breakthrough products while reducing the risk of costly misses [1]. Almost 60 percent of the companies surveyed used prototypes only for internal testing, late in development [1]. Top performers shared early prototypes with outsiders and kept iterating after launch [1].

SaaS takeaway: software already ships in releases, so let design follow the same rhythm.

  • Put a clickable prototype in front of customers before you build.
  • Release in small steps, and treat every landing page and onboarding flow as a draft you'll improve with data.

What this means for your SaaS design budget

SaaS teams already work in releases, and McKinsey points out that almost every commercial software publisher keeps updating its products after launch [1]. So the iterative habit the study rewards is close at hand. What's left to decide is whether design is part of that loop or something you buy in bursts.

Is design worth it for an early-stage SaaS company?

The study didn't include software companies, but its pattern points to yes, with one condition: do it consistently.

McKinsey’s payoff sat with companies that were strong across all four themes [1]. A small team doesn't need a big department for that. It needs someone who owns design quality, work tied to the metrics you track, and design that runs every week instead of only before a launch or a funding round.

Where should a SaaS team start with design?

Start with one product or project.

McKinsey found that one of the most powerful first steps is to pick an important upcoming product or service and use it as a pilot for getting all four themes right. That approach showed far better financial results than trying to improve design across the whole company at once [1]. For a SaaS team, the pilot could be your onboarding flow, your pricing page or your next major feature.

Should you cut design spend when budgets get tight?

Successful companies in the study tended to be the ones that resisted cutting spending on research, prototyping or concept generation at the first sign of trouble, a strong correlation in McKinsey’s data [1]. It also recommends agreeing formal design budgets with design leaders, so they don't sit hidden as line items in marketing or engineering [1].

If you're weighing cuts, protect the research and testing work first.

How to build top-quartile design habits without a big in-house team

Hiring a senior designer for every discipline is a big step for a growing SaaS company. Cluma runs product, brand and website design as a modular subscription, and it's design only: your developers or your build partner implement what we design. Each module works like a senior-led designer seat for one discipline, and a senior designer owns the direction and reviews the final output of every deliverable. You pay a flat monthly fee per module. Add or remove modules month to month, and pause anytime.

Here's how the work maps onto McKinsey’s four habits:

  • Measurable: every request, update and revision lives in your private Trello board, one column per module, so each request can name the metric it should move and you can check it against your numbers.
  • One experience: product, brand and website design come from one team, so the journey from the first ad to the app stays consistent.
  • Cross-functional: your product, marketing and engineering people work in the same board as the designers, with one request in progress per module and as many as you like queued behind it.
  • Continuous: design keeps pace with your releases. Everyday design tasks, like a social post, an ad or a one-pager, are delivered in about 48 hours. Bigger projects such as UX/UI, product design or a website move milestone by milestone, with progress roughly every 48 hours.

See Cluma pricing, how the subscription works for startups or the full list of design services.

If you'd like to talk it through, book an intro call and we'll look at where design could move your numbers first.

About the data

McKinsey published “The Business Value of Design” in October 2018 [1], and its exhibits cover 2013 to 2018 [2]. The 300 companies are publicly listed firms in medical technology, consumer goods and retail banking, so no software company was in the sample. Design practice was captured through interviews and surveys with senior leaders [1]. The 32 and 56 are percentage points of cumulative growth over five years, compared with industry peers [1]. McKinsey reports them as a strong correlation, and we present them the same way: design strength and financial results moved together in the data. More numbers on design ROI sit in our roundup of SaaS design investment statistics.

References

  1. McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Quarterly, Benedict Sheppard, Hugo Sarrazin, Garen Kouyoumjian and Fabricio Dore, The business value of design, 25.10.2018. 300 publicly listed companies over five years in three industries (medical technology, consumer goods, retail banking), senior business and design leaders interviewed or surveyed. Limits: correlation, self-reported design practice, no software companies in the sample. McKinsey also runs a design consulting practice.
  2. McKinsey & Company, The Business Value of Design (PDF, 18 pages). Exhibits 1 to 5, source line “McKinsey Value of Design survey of 300 global companies, July 2018”. Exhibit values are read from the chart labels. Same limits as [1].
Christoph Bogatzki, Cluma
Cluma Editorial
1The team behind the subscription