Design-Led Companies Beat the S&P 500 by 211%: What They Do

Christoph Bogatzki, Cluma
Christoph Bogatzki
•
8
min read
In a calm meeting room, Blink studies the end of a rising purple line on a printed chart through a magnifying glass while Mumble hovers behind him, watching
Group of colorful Cluma monster characters standing in a row
Get a design team that ships every 48 hours

Senior-led design for SaaS teams, one flat monthly price per module.

Thanks, you're in. Pick a time that works for you:
Book a call
Something went wrong. Please check your email and try again.

Design-led companies win: in the Design Management Institute's 2015 Design Value Index, 16 publicly traded design-led companies delivered ten-year returns 2.11 times those of the S&P 500 over 2005 to 2015, which DMI reports as a 211% outperformance [1].

The names are familiar: Apple, Nike, Intuit, SAP, Starbucks, IBM, Target and Walt Disney among them.

It wasn't a one-year fluke.

DMI calls 2015 “the third year in a row” that the index beat the S&P 500 by more than 200% [1].

If you run a SaaS company, the useful question isn't whether Apple is good at design. It's whether design deserves a steady line in your budget.

So look at what these companies actually do with it. They don't share a product category, a price point or even an industry: coffee, sneakers, tax software and enterprise resource planning all sit on the same list. What they share is a way of running design, and most of that way of working scales down to a small team like yours.

Every figure here comes from the published DMI results and an interview with the index's author, which we read in full on 24.09.2026. You'll find more sourced numbers on the Cluma reports page.

What is the Design Value Index?

The Design Value Index (DVI) is a stock index built by the Design Management Institute with the consultancy Motiv Strategies. Microsoft funded the work, according to DMI [3]. It takes companies that meet a strict set of design management criteria, weights them by market capitalisation and tracks them against the S&P 500 over the previous ten years [5] [6].

Three editions were published. Each one put design-led companies far ahead.

EditionTen-year windowCompaniesResult vs S&P 500
2013 [5]2003 to 201315228%
2014 [4]2004 to 201416219%
2015 [1] [2]2005 to 201516211%

So when you see 228%, 219% or 211% quoted for the same idea, they're all real, just from different editions. Quote 211% with 2015 and you're using the latest one.

The first edition shows what that looks like in money. A hypothetical $10,000 in the index grew to $39,922.89, while the same $10,000 in the S&P 500 grew to $17,522.15 [5]. That's where 228% comes from: 39,922.89 divided by 17,522.15 is 2.28.

Which companies are design-led?

Sixteen companies appear on the 2015 index chart [1] [2]: Apple, Coca-Cola, Ford, Herman Miller, IBM, Intuit, Nike, Procter & Gamble, SAP, Starbucks, Starwood, Stanley Black & Decker, Steelcase, Target, Walt Disney and Whirlpool.

Getting in wasn't easy.

A company had to show that design operates at scale across the business, has a place at the leadership table, is run by experienced design executives, gets growing investment and has backing from the very top [1]. It also had to be listed in the US for ten years, which DMI says was there to select companies with “a consistent, long-term focus on design” [3].

Two of them are software companies at heart, Intuit and SAP. That matters if you sell software, because their story is the closest to yours.

What do design-led companies have in common?

Read the criteria and case notes side by side and four habits come up again and again. None of them is about a signature look.

Leadership backs design from the top

In every index company, design has a seat at the table. The index looks for an executive-level head of design who can work directly with senior leadership, and for a CEO who shows the importance of design “in their day-to-day work” [3]. Jeneanne Rae, who built the index, put it simply: the CEOs of all the DVI companies “already understand the power of design and do their best to enable it” [6]. Apple is the clearest case. Its decade of success, in the words of DMI, was earned in large part through products designed under its head of design. DMI calls Apple “an example of what good design combined with good business strategy can achieve” [4].

Design sits inside product decisions

Design isn't called in at the end to make things pretty. The criteria require that it's “clearly built into the structure and processes of the organization” [3], with an operating model that works hand in hand with marketing, R&D and operations [4]. SAP shows how that plays out in software. Its co-founder Hasso Plattner became convinced that human-centred design would make its software “more intuitive and easier to use”, and the company then went to work “integrating design into its product development processes” [1]. By the 2015 edition its design function had grown to over 500 people [1].

One design standard across every touchpoint

The index only admits companies where design “operates at scale across the enterprise” [1], both inside business units and as a central function [3]. In the 2014 wording, design staff and practices had to reach “all major business units” [4].

For your customers, that means the product, the website, the ads and the onboarding all feel like the same company, and nobody has to relearn how you work at each step.

They invest continuously, not in bursts

Every index company grew its design investment over time: head count, infrastructure and volume of projects [4]. We like how blunt the criteria are here: “Design cannot be expected to thrive when proper resourcing is neglected” [3].

IBM is a good example of a steady commitment. In 2013 it announced it would spend $100 million over five years on design staff, programmes and facilities [4]. That's a multi-year budget line, not a one-off redesign.

Why does design pay off?

The explanation is about customers. Mature design capabilities let design-driven companies “grow faster, and often with higher margins, due to the exceptional customer experiences they are uniquely positioned to create” [4]. Rae goes a step further. Companies that embrace design, she says, understand their customers better than those that don't, and “as a result, they grow faster and with higher margins and recover faster during economic downturns” [6].

That's also why the index authors treat design as “a highly integrated and influential force” in these companies [1]. The returns don't come from one clever redesign. They come from design running through the whole business, year after year, until your customers expect it.

What does this mean for a SaaS team?

Software is where these lessons land hardest. Rae called it the biggest trend she saw: more and more companies “are becoming software driven and need to build useable, intuitive and beautiful interfaces”, which she adds “is harder than it seems” [6]. DMI's 2014 edition already described UX design as a dominant and growing force, outpacing every other design discipline [4]. You can put these habits to work without a Chief Design Officer:

  • Give design an owner. One senior person is accountable for how your product, site and brand look and work, and that person talks to the founders directly.
  • Bring design in before the ticket. Let design shape the feature brief and the pricing page, not only the final screens.
  • Keep one system. The same components, type and tone in the app, the website, the sales deck and your onboarding emails.
  • Budget design monthly. A steady line in the budget beats a big redesign now and then that nobody maintains.
  • Track what it changes. Watch activation, trial conversion and support tickets before and after design work, so the case for design gets stronger every quarter.

For software-specific numbers to put next to the DVI, see our SaaS design investment statistics.

Do you need a big design team to work like this?

Not to get started. After the 2015 edition, Rae wrote that she no longer thinks it “takes 10 years to build a highly-functional design organization”. With the right leadership and senior support, it “can be built in less and less time” [1].

The index companies did build large in-house teams over time. What a smaller company can copy first is how they run design: senior ownership, a place in product decisions, one standard and steady investment. Our view is that head count is the part you can rent while you grow.

How can a SaaS company without a design team adopt these habits?

That's the gap Cluma was built for. Cluma runs design as a modular subscription: each module works like a senior-led designer seat for one discipline, such as product and UX, website or brand, at a flat monthly price per module. We only do design, so your developers keep building while the design keeps moving.

Here's how it maps to the habits you've just read about:

Design-led habitHow it works with Cluma
Leadership backs designA senior designer owns direction and signs off every deliverable. Work is senior-owned and senior-reviewed.
Design inside product decisionsRequests start as briefs in your private Trello board, one column per module, so design shapes a feature before it's built. Updates and revisions run there too.
One standard everywhereProduct, website and brand modules run side by side in one board, each senior-reviewed, so every touchpoint can follow one system.
Continuous investmentA flat monthly price per module makes design a steady budget line. Everyday design tasks come back in about 48 hours, and bigger projects move milestone by milestone, with progress roughly every 48 hours.

Each module has one request in progress at a time, and you can queue as many as you like behind it. Add or remove modules month to month, or pause anytime, so your design budget follows your roadmap.

We'd rather you keep design running all year.

See every design service and subscription pricing per module, or book an intro call and we'll show you what the first month could look like for your product.

About the data

Our reading of the fine print, briefly. The DVI is a hypothetical, market-cap-weighted portfolio, not a fund you can buy [1]. DMI and Motiv hand-picked its companies against their criteria, looking back over ten years, and DMI publishes the result without every underlying value. It shows that design-led companies outperformed, which is correlation. DMI itself describes design as an integrated force behind the results, not “a pure factor” [1]. Apple carries “considerable weight” because the index is weighted by market value. Without Apple, the 2014 edition still finished 138% above the S&P 500 [4]. The three editions cover different ten-year windows, and the 2015 edition, published in December 2016, is the latest we could find from DMI [1] [6].

Questions about the Design Value Index

What does the 211% in the Design Value Index mean?

DMI reports that its 16 design-led companies delivered ten-year returns “2.11 times (211%) that of the S&P 500” over 2005 to 2015 [1].

Which software companies are in the Design Value Index?

Intuit and SAP. SAP joined in the 2015 edition [1], and Intuit is on both the 2014 list [4] and the 2015 chart [1].

Is there a Design Value Index ETF?

No. The index “is not currently an index fund”, in the words of DMI [1]. It's a research index.

References

  1. Design Management Institute and Motiv Strategies, Jeneanne Rae, 2015 dmi:Design Value Index Results and Commentary, December 2016, read 24.09.2026. 16 companies, 2005 to 2015. Primary source for the 211% figure, the company list, the selection criteria and the SAP profile. Note: a hypothetical portfolio selected by the authors, who also offer design management consulting and training.
  2. Design Management Institute, Design Value Index Exemplars Outperform the S&P 500 Index (Again) (PDF), DMI Review Vol. 27, Issue 4, 2016. Print version of [1], chart from June 2005 to December 2015.
  3. Design Management Institute, The Value of Design, undated summary page, read 24.09.2026. Detailed selection criteria and Microsoft funding. Note: its banner still shows the 2014 figure (219%).
  4. Design Management Institute and Motiv Strategies, Jeneanne Rae, 2014 Design Value Index Results and Commentary, May 2015. 16 companies, 2004 to 2014, 219%, 138% excluding Apple. Apple, IBM and UX trend notes. Same note as [1].
  5. Jeneanne Rae, What Is the Real Value of Design? (PDF), DMI Review, Winter 2013. First edition, 2003 to 2013: $10,000 grew to $39,922.89 in the index and $17,522.15 in the S&P 500. Weighting method. Note: the text says 14 companies, the sidebar lists 15.
  6. Debbie Yong, The Design Value Index Shows What “Design Thinking” Is Worth, Fortune, 31.08.2017. Interview with Jeneanne Rae on method, results and trends. Trade press.
Christoph Bogatzki, Cluma
Cluma Editorial
1The team behind the subscription